Category: Uncategorized

  • Mountlake Terrace Passes Fortify/No Hate Resolution!

    Mountlake Terrace, WA – On Thursday, Sept 17th, at their regular City Council meeting, the Mountlake Terrace City Council unanimously passed (6-0) their version of the Fortify!/No Hate model resolution (online petition) to a full audience composed about half with No Hate supporters. Councilmember Wahl was absent.

    This makes MLT the third city this week to pass such resolutions, on the heels of Kenmore and Seattle, which both took similar action. MLT’s passage brings the total number of resolutions in support of the No Hate in WA State campaign opposing Brian Heywood’s extremist agenda to five, with more cities slated to take similar action in the next few weeks. You can follow that progress in this post: https://fortifywa.org/2026/09/17/resolution-activity-fall-2026/

    “In the midst of a tidal wave of anti-trans legislation in 2026,” said Councilmember Doyle, who lead the effort to bring the resolution to the Council, “adopting this resolution is one way to combat anti-trans sentiment and outright hatred that is unfortunately becoming all too common and brazen in this country.”

    [Councilmember Doyle’s comments are presented in full at the bottom of this post.]

    City Manager Jeff Niten noted before the vote that passing the resolution would “formalize the City Council’s position.”

    Councilmember Paige talked about how the No Hate campaign took him back to his own youth and fight against hate.

    “When I was in 8th grade, in 1972-73, I remember in April, because of all the things that were going on in Boston,” he said.

    “I realized that, kind of, the things that are going on now aren’t too much different than what was happening then. And I remember as an 8th grader in April, a whole bunch of us. … We had this little chant. We walked out of the Frank V Thompson school and we had to walk across this little bridge over the railroad track, and we were saying “No hate, No hate.” … “No Hate. No Hate. You got me waitin’ because you’re discriminatin’. No hate. No hate.” And it just really make me jump back and reflect on what it is that’s going on here. And I would just be remiss if I just didn’t say something about how important it is – that we’re talking about our children.”

    “I know what hate looks like. I know what it feels like. I know what it smells like,” he added. “And I know how it affects, y’know, children and adults.”

    The meeting was well attended by supporters, with a strong showing by the Snohomish County Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), who, with other supporters, stuck it out through over two hours of proclamations and presentations before the vote was taken.

    As of this writing, the next cities slated to take up Fortify!/No Hate model resolutions are Issaquah on Sept. 22 (proposed resolution and staff report), Lake Forest Park on Sept 24th (Agendas & Minutes) and Bothell tentatively on Oct 6 (Agenda Center).

    Additionally, King County Council is slated to take action on Sept 22 on two initiatives, one each opposing 638 and 001 (meeting agenda).

    Councilmember Doyle’s powerful comments from the dais, in their entirety:

    First, thank you to allies for coming tonight and showing us all that the word  “ally” is not only a noun–it’s also a verb. As a queer person with trans family and friends, I want to thank you personally for showing up. But obviously adopting this resolution isn’t about me, or my family, it’s about all of us–trans and cisgender alike. It’s about everyone in this city–whether a resident or a visitor. It’s about the safety of our children, all of our children. 

    Two of our Council goals are: 
    An Informed and Engaged Community
    Growing Our Vibrant Community

    Taking an official position by passing a resolution opposing IL26-001 and IL26-638 helps us as a council to put these goals into action. As individuals, governing bodies, and cities, we can espouse certain values/set goals on paper but often the more challenging part is when it’s time to turn theoretical values/goals into public action.  

    THIS is one of those times. 

    In the midst of a tidal wave of anti-trans legislation in 2026, adopting this resolution is one way to combat anti-trans sentiment and outright hatred that is unfortunately becoming all too common and brazen in this country. In 2026 alone, dozens of such measures have become law, affecting health care, education, public accommodations, identification documents, athletics, and other parts of everyday life. Our resolution tonight is part of a much bigger picture. Let’s join Kenmore, Shoreline, and Tacoma by taking a stand. 

    I also see opposing these initiatives as an affirmation of our commitment to public safety via public health advocacy, as we are committing to upholding the right of bodily autonomy and privacy, in this instance for girls–ALL girls. 

    It’s notable that this vote is taking place during Welcoming Week- one of the goals of Welcoming Week (a national event) is to build inclusive communities and foster a sense of belonging for all residents. I invite my colleagues to join me in voting YES to oppose both of these initiatives, and by doing so we can show publicly that Mountlake Terrace is indeed committed to including all people, embracing the beautiful diversity of our trans and LGBTQIA+ neighbors, and protecting our community’s children from harm.

  • Resolution Activity Fall 2026

    Here is a quick rundown of resolution activity as of Oct 6, 2026. SUCCESSES are below the Urgent list at the top. We’re now up to nine municipalities plus Seattle Public Schools opposing Brian Heywood’s extremism!

    1: Urgent upcoming Asks, Agendas, and Mobilizations (Go to these meetings!)
    2: Passages (Victories)
    3: Rejections/Losses (The List of Shame)
    4: Upcoming Unconfirmed
    5: Likely Low-Hanging Fruit, if the public would just make an ask!

    URGENT: Upcoming Asks, Agendas, and Mobilizations (Go to these meetings!):

    • Monday 10/12 – Confirmed Ask-To-Agendize Mobilization. Approaching last chances to make an ask of the Lynnwood City Council. A Lynnwood councilmember was unable to get support for a resolution, but a public comment ask mobilization can always change that! (meetings at 6 pm). They only take public comment on 2nd and 4th meetings.
    • Mon Oct 19 – Bellingham is scheduled to take up resolutions opposing 001/638 on Oct 19th, as well as one prohibiting algorithmic price-fixing in the rental market (also very cool!). (meetings at 7 pm).
    • Tues 10/20 – Kirkland is slated to take up two resolutions opposing 001 and 638 on Tues, Oct 20(agenda planner here, meetings at 7:30 pm).

    Passages (Victories!) Most recent at top:

    1. 10/6, Bothell passed a resolution opposing 001/638. (meetings at 6 pm). Council voted as follows on the resolutions opposing the initiatives. CM Brittany Miles voted no because she didn’t think that taking a position on these initiatives was a proper action for the Council, stating that she didn’t see a sufficient connection between the issues raised by these initiatives and the core interests of the city.
    2. 10/6 – Olympia passed resolutions opposing 001/638 (agenda): CMs Kelly Green, Paul Berendt, Dani Madrone, Robert Vanderpool, and Mayor Dontae Payne all endorse No Hate (meetings and agendas)
    3. 10/05 – Vancouver passed a resolution opposing 001/638!
    4. 9/24 – Lake Forest Park passed three resolutions opposing all of the Heywood initiatives: Lake Forest Park Resolutions 26-2100 (001), 2101 (638), 2102 (645).
    5. 9/23 – Seattle Public Schools passed three resolutions opposing all of Heywood’s initiatives.
    6. 9/22 – King County Council passed their resolutions on two initiatives, one each opposing 638 and 001, both sponsored by Mosqueda and Barón. Council members Reagan Dunn and Peter von Reichbauer voted against both resolutions. Watch the video of the meeting. It’s powerful. King County Council Motions No. 2026-0264 (638), 2026-0265 (001).
    7. 9/22 – Issaquah passed their resolution opposing 001/638 (Proposed by CM Nichols, seconded by CM Walsh. Passed unanimously): Issaquah Resolution No. 2026-23
    8. 9/17 – Mountlake Terrace unanimously passed a resolution opposing 001/638: Mountlake Terrace RESO 933
    9. 9/15 – Seattle passed a resolution opposing 001/638: Seattle Resolution No. 32218
    10. 9/14 – Kenmore passed three resolutions, one each opposing all three Heywood initiatives: Kenmore Resolutions 26-451, 452, 453
    11. 8/17 – Shoreline passed a resolution opposing 001/638. Article from The Osprey on the meeting. Shoreline Res567.
    12. 7/28 – Tacoma passed a resolution opposing 001/638: Tacoma Res41972

    Rejections/Losses! (Booooooo!)

    1. Oct 6 – Boo Sammamish! A Right-wing wingnut showed up with a contingent to help Sammamish vote down (4-3) taking action on resolutions opposing 001/638, despite being outnumbered by speakers in favor of opposing Heywood’s terrible initiatives (agenda). Deputy Mayor Debbie Treen, seconded by her husband and CC member Kent Treen,with support from Mayor Josh Amato and CM Michael Boyer voted to delay voting on a resolution indefinitely (i.e., against opposing 001/638 – Boo!). CC members Amy Lan, Roisin O’Farrell, and Pam Stuart were in support of a resolution opposing 001/638 (yay!). (meetings at 7 pm)
    2. Oct 6 – Boo Edmonds! After impassioned public comment, a strong mobilization, and no opposition, CM Jenna Nand appropriately proposed amending the agenda to vote on JUST AGENDIZING the resolution for action at the next meeting. Councilmembers Chris Eck and Susan Paine supported her motion. The rest (CMs Chen, Barnett, Olsen, and President Dotsch) rejected it, with some trying to hide behind “procedural” grounds. Mayor Rosen was silent, even skipping his “Mayor’s Comments” at the end of the meeting (meetings at 6 pm) Does Edmonds need a bit of waking up?

    Upcoming Unconfirmed

    Likely low-hanging fruit with elected officials who endorse No Hate, but likely just need the public to ask them to pass a resolution!

    • Olympia School Board: Directors Gil Lamont, Renee Fullerton and Vice President Maria Flores endorse No Hate (meetings and agendas).

    This will be updated with any changes as quickly as possible.

  • Mountlake Terrace to take up Fortify!/No Hate-based Resolution Thurs, Sept 17th

    No Hate in WA State and Fortify! Washington are excited to share that Mountlake Terrace City Council will be taking up the No Hate/Fortify! WA model resolution at their regular meeting on Thursday, Sept 17th! We’re asking folks to show up at Mountlake Terrace City Hall to show the Council that the community supports them taking this stand against Brian Heywood’s hate. These are your most local elected officials, so help them take this stand. Bring signs (you can print one here). And be sure to sign the Fortify! WA-hosted online petition to show support for this effort. Share it to seed efforts at other city councils across Washington.

    MLT City Council Meeting Mobilization
    City Hall: 23204 58th Avenue W., Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
    Date: Thursday, Sept 17th, 2026
    CC Meeting: 7:00 pm, City Hall Chambers
    Online No Hate/Fortify! Petition (sign and share everywhere!)
    Printable Solidarity Sign to hold up during the meeting
    Submitting Public Comment to City Council (by 4 pm day of): Jennifer Joki, jjoki@mltwa.gov or cityhall@mltwa.gov
    City Council Agenda for Thurs, Sept 17th

    Participate as you are comfortable, from just being present to speaking at public comment! It’s most important that folks are there, especially allies (who were in disappointingly short supply at the Shoreline action). If you’d like to speak, it’s always best to speak from the heart as to why this is important to you, and end with the simple ask: “Please pass this resolution tonight.” We ask that you please speak respectfully.

  • Another Victory in Shoreline! Council passes Res567 Opposing Brian Heywood’s Bigoted Initiatives

    Shoreline WA – On Monday, Aug 17th, at their regular meeting, Shoreline City Council unanimously passed Res567 opposing Brian Heywood’s anti-trans, homophobic, and misogynistic initiatives I-001 and I-638, with Mayor Robertson and Deputy Mayor Pobee absent. Sponsored by Councilmembers Laura Mork and Chris Roberts, the effort is the result of a request to agendize and pass the collaborative Fortify!/No Hate in WA State model resolution made during Pride month in June.

    What we asked for: Fortify! WA against Anti-Trans Initiatives and Wealthy Extremists
    What we got: Res 567 Opposing 001 and 638 (amended staff report)

    Councilmember Chris Roberts gave an impassioned speech about why he had cosponsored the resolution, relating his understanding of the difficulties faced by the Trans community. The other present councilmembers also shared their reasoning


    behind their support, and that was all promising.

    Unfortunately, while the resolution got the job done by registering the Council’s opposition to the initiatives, the language it used did not meet the urgency of the moment or the extremity of Brian Heywood’s efforts, unlike a stronger resolution passed by Tacoma in late July. That resolution both called it like it is (“genital exams”) and went a step further, directly encouraging Tacoma voters to vote against these initiatives in November (which, following their precedent, has been added to the Fortify!/No Hate model resolution).

    Amendments made by CM Roberts improved the language and corrected errors, but its “neutral” language still risked whitewashing the reality of Heywood’s initiatives and normalizing the unreasonable.

    So while Res567 is a victory, it’s bittersweet, as it was not the repudiation that these initiatives deserve. I believe having a stronger mobilization showing for the initial ask might have encouraged the council to take and use more of the model resolution’s provided language. In this case, it was a “quiet” ask the Shoreline Pride Raising event, unlike the large mobilization for the initial ask for February’s Res560 to protect immigrants.

    The lesson: For many reasons, it’s ideal to build and show power for the initial ask.

    The final resolution also chose to not take a stand on money in politics or encouraging voters to better vet the initiative petitions that they sign.

    Another facet of this was the participation of allies.

    Despite the risk that such public advocacy brings, the trans/queer community showed up to the meeting, sharing some horrifying stories of harassment/bigotry while advocating for themselves and their right to exist in peace.

    Allies… not so much, which is a bummer. These initiatives are really bad, not just for the trans/queer community, but for girls and women as a whole. Soccer star Megan Rapinoe makes that case in no uncertain terms in her article Anti-Trans Legislation Isn’t About “Protecting Girls”—It’s About Distracting Us From What Matters. 

    There are more opportunities out there, however, so c’mon, allies, let’s show up. These are your city councils, your most local elected officials, folks who live in your community and, because of having been elected to local office, more likely to rise up the ladder.

    If you’re concerned about who’s running for higher level office, then start looking at who’s running for city councils. In 2026, Rep Cindy Ryu and State Senator Jesse Salomon both started at Shoreline City Council. In the August primary for higher office, two Shoreline CC members and two Edmonds CC members were on the ballot.

    I really hope that more allies will see the importance of turning out to see these resolutions agendized and passed. The next opportunity is Mountlake Terrace on September 17th.

    So Mountlake Terrace folks, get your friends to sign the petition and show that they support opposing these initiatives. The best way to garner support: Get hard copy signatures. Go to local, friendly protests. Ask to table in front of the library or other public spaces.

    Let’s be clear: Brian Heywood got (conned) almost 450 THOUSAND people to sign his petitions. Yes, they were paid signature gatherers, but that’s still a staggering number of people who were asked and consented to sign.

    Edmonds, Lynnwood, Kenmore, and Woodinville have also shown interest in the effort, so let’s get LTBTQIA2+ allies and women/girls’ rights advocates on board with both showing support for the Fortify!/No Hate model resolution (online petition here) and showing up to YOUR city councils ask them to agendize and pass that resolution, letting them know this is important to you.

    The trans community came out to advocate for their rights as well as the rights of cis-girls and women, especially those of color, because they see that, while they are the first target, the ultimate goal is the greater oppression of women.

    It can’t just fall on our trans siblings to be doing this work to protect their rights and lives, as well as those of cis-girls and women. And we all need to be paying attention to our most local elected officials, who might just eventually run for higher office.

    The Right has been historically very effective at targeting local officials and getting serious results, essentially using our own tools against us. We need to take that back, we have the platform of issues to do that, and Fortify! WA exists to make that happen.

    Media Hits:
    https://www.ospreynews.net/p/shoreline-council-rejects-anti-transgender-initiatives

  • Mobilize! Shoreline CC to Take Up Res567 Monday, Aug 17th

    Monday, Aug 17th, at their 7 pm meeting, the Shoreline City Council will vote on proposed Resolution 567 to oppose Brian Heywood’s terrible initiatives, as originally requested at the Shoreline Pride Raising event.

    Mountlake Terrace will also be taking up this resolution on Sept 3rd (CM Sam Doyle leading). This is a chance to show both councils that the community supports them taking this stand against Brian Heywood’s bigotry and extremism.

    Help us mobilize supporters to show the Shoreline City Council that we support them taking this stand. You can also provide online public comment by 4 pm day-of (Aug 17th). This is a great opportunity to see local direct action organizing in action, if you’re new to it!

    Tacoma also passed its own resolution a couple of weeks ago, setting an excellent precedent, and Mountlake Terrace CM Sam Doyle let CM Chris Eck (Edmonds) and Isabel Mata (Lynnwood) know about Fortify!/No Hate endeavor. Councilmember Jon Culver (Kenmore) and Mayor Sarah Arndt (Woodinville) have also shown interest. The No Hate campaign has also contacted Seattle CM Dionne Foster.

    The more local community members who organize to support these efforts to pass local resolutions, the more likely they are to happen! See how it worked back in February with Shoreline Res560.

    Please sign and share the No Hate model resolution online petition with your friends/contacts to grow our power and spread this to more cities, especially if you’re in any of the above-listed cities.

    Shoreline City Council Meeting Mobilization
    City Hall: 17500 Midvale Ave N Shoreline, WA 98133-4905
    Parking: Parking garage behind City Hall or on Midvale Ave
    Date: Monday, Aug 17th, 2026
    Meet: 6:30 pm, City Hall Lobby
    CC Meeting: 7:00 pm, City Hall Chambers
    Online No Hate/Fortify! Petition (sign and share everywhere!)
    Printable Solidarity Sign 
    Shoreline Proposed Res567 opposing I-001 and I-638
    Submitting Public Comment to Shoreline CC
    Shoreline CC Agendas Page

    Participate as you are comfortable, from just being present to speaking at public comment! It’s most important that folks are there.

    If you’d like to speak, it’s always best to speak from the heart as to why this is important to you, and end with the simple ask: “Please pass this resolution tonight.”

    We ask that you please speak respectfully.

  • Fortify! WA against Brian Heywood’s Wealthy Extremism Series of Model Resolutions

    Unfortunately, MAGA mega-donor, “Christian” extremist, and serial initiative process-abuser Brian Heywood was successful in tricking everyday working folks into acting against their own interest and signing his petitions to get I-645 on the ballot, so he can be as greedy as he wants and not pay his fair share of taxes.

    Part of it is certainly that money buys marketing that is used to deceive people and make them take action against their own interests. Part is hypocritically and cynically asking working people to abide by the myth/code of the “self-made man,” that the uber-wealthy themselves do not (https://www.faireconomy.org/i_didnt_do_it_alone). Part of it is those same uber-wealthy using those self-made bootstrap myths to convince the rest of us that we are “temporarily embarrassed millionaires,” who risk our own (non-existent) opportunities for massive wealth by simply asking them to pay their fair share.

    The rich get to use their money to make money. The rest of us must use our actual labor to make money, and that is if, and only if, the “market” recognizes our work as “worthy”, where critical needs, like caregiving, do not get the recognition that more frivolous or luxury endeavors do.

    The playing field is not level, but uber-rich people like Heywood will do everything they can to convince us it is – like it’s raining when they’re actually… Well, you know how it goes.

    At the end of the day, though, it’s simply this: Money buys politics, and folks like Brian Heywood have the money to regularly and repeatedly waste our time and money by trying to impose their extremist agendas on us.

    So we must now not only defend our girls and LGBTQIA+ community from Heywood’s horrific Jeffrey Epstein/Larry Nasser-creepy homophobic and anti-transgender initiatives, we must now defend working-class Washingtonian’s from his greed and unwillingness to pay his fair share.

    These two Fortify! model resolutions, together, exist to help defeat all of Heywood’s rotten 2026 initiatives. If we do this, we get closer to stopping people like Brian Heywood from wasting our precious time, money, and taxpayer dollars defending ourselves from their harm and greed.

    Is defeating his initiatives important to you? Then here’s something concrete you can do: Ask your city councils to take a stand against Heywood’s attempts to harm our communities, and learn how to organize to lean on your elected officials in the process (a la the Midwest Academy).

    The mission is straightforward: Get a group together (build power). Ask your city council to “Please agendize and pass these resolutions in two weeks” at the next meeting’s public comment. Grow your group using the petition (build more power). Mobilize the folks who signed your petition (power) to attend the meeting and support your City Council passing these resolutions when they take action. For an example, see “A Recipe for Swift Victory.“

    Organizing materials below.

    Fortify! WA by Defending the Millionaires’ Tax from A Greedy Rich Extremist

    This model resolution amplifies the work of Invest in WA Now.

    Online Petition (sign and share!): https://share.mayfirst.org/apps/forms/s/KbE4SbjQoeQjJNCXsAGiQnYr
    Hard-copy PDF materials folder: https://share.mayfirst.org/s/eQZMoPS8yA8dfc2

    Fortify! WA against Anti-Trans Initiatives and Wealthy Extremists

    This model resolution amplifies the work of No Hate in WA State.

    Online Petition (sign and share!): https://share.mayfirst.org/apps/forms/s/Pa2KmkEknQf4jHJSDFRZiZca
    Hard-copy PDF materials folder: https://share.mayfirst.org/s/mfdMxP2ZdrByHaJ

    Articles:
    Marie Claire, July 13, 2026: Anti-Trans Legislation Isn’t About “Protecting Girls”—It’s About Distracting Us From What Matters (Soccer Star Megan Rapinoe on how Heywood’s initiatives are an attack on women as a whole.)
    KUOW, June 4, 2026: Transgender ballot initiative could require genital exams for WA secondary school students

  • The Rationale behind Fortify! City Council Model Resolutions

    There are folks who will say that passing city council resolutions is a waste of time. And they can be right. There are plenty of examples of resolutions that are weak and performative. But this attitude may also simply belie a different analysis of what it means to organize at the city council level.

    Sometimes these folks are looking for specific policy wins that can’t be had at the City Council level, and they don’t know or understand the opportunity and potential that city council resolutions provide as tools for local power-building, so they erroneously dismiss in its entirety.

    This also comes from thinking like government staff/officials/policy wonks and not like organizers. The latter has goals that are more expansive than the former, including things that won’t be as important to, for example, city staff, who are focused on the nuts-and-bolts of policy.

    Unfortunately, this dismissal of bigger-picture city council action helps encourage folks to ignore our most local elected officials entirely, allowing those local bodies to run so far under the radar that most people don’t even know the names of their most local elected officials. Instead their attention is drawn to the President or other higher-level officials, over whom they have very little actual power.

    We can say with confidence that city residents, if they will work to effectively organize and exercise it, have much more power over their most local elected officials, who, incidentally, compose the beginning of a political pipeline to higher office.

    In 2026 in WA District 32, there are four city council members running for higher office (Chris Roberts and Keith Scully of Shoreline City Council and Jenna Nand and Will Chen from Edmonds City Council). Current State Rep Cindy Ryu and State Senator Jesse Salomon both started on the Shoreline City Council.

    We ignore these local bodies at our peril. They essentially provide paid training to those wishing to eventually seek higher office. Were they unopposed when first elected? Were they appointed to a vacant seat? Are they the people we want to see moving up the ladder?

    Model resolutions on issues that resonate with voters is an excellent tool for getting folks engaged with these bodies. Shoreline Res560 in Feb. ’26 proved that.

    It’s about using the right tool for the job, and if the desired outcome is bigger than just a specific policy win, it changes the tool we need to use, or how we use it. We must think like organizers, not like city staff. We must not self-limit ourselves to what we think can happen, but ask for what we want to happen.

    This process, while always a work-in-progress, is based on over two decades of organizing in the Midwest Academy model of direct action organizing and its tool, the Strategy Chart. It also takes inspiration from large-scale city council resolution campaigns like Medicare4All, and builds on Move to Amend’s model resolution template.

    To focus specifically on city councils and engender a long-term habit of organizing requires a tool that is multi-issue but accessible to emerging organizers who are starting from scratch. This is where the model resolution comes in.

    Model resolutions that amplify established issue expert organizations are exactly the tool needed to generate engagement at scale (multiple cities without reinventing the wheel). That said, community-group resolutions that don’t amplify existing organizations are often performative and weaker than they could be, which is not helpful, allowing those councils that pass such resolutions to take the credit without actually taking a stand or effecting change.

    But for many of the issues we want to promote, the cities may not actually have much (or any) power. This doesn’t mean there aren’t ways for them to take a stand that is both substantive to them and to the grassroots community. So the key is to get as much out of the model resolution process as possible, and that goes beyond thinking like city staff or government officials.

    Following are some characteristics and tricks that help make model resolutions as effective as they can be for city councils, while serving as the rallying and engagement points that are their ultimate power:

    1. Can be used in any city across the state. The goal of being a model resolution is that anyone across the state can use it, so, while working to make it substantive, it must also be seen as a foundation and starting point that sets the stage for any necessary further or deeper work on that issue, which might be different and unique to different cities.
    2. Two pages or less. This makes it printable on 1 two-sided sheet of paper.
    3. Amplifies an established expert organization’s work. Don’t reinvent the wheel! And, more critically, acknowledge and respect the work of experts in the issue area, especially if led by those who are directly impacted by the issue. Organizers do the organizing, experts do the experting.
    4. Is an issue that will resonate with people across the state (or further!). Again, don’t reinvent the wheel. Political platforms exist because they resonate widely. Rely on them. We know the major issues we face. If necessary, use a rubric to analyze issues, like the table for “Choosing and Issue” in the Midwest Academy‘s manual Organizing for Social Change, Chapter 3 (out of print, but a scanned PDF here). And remember the three principles of direct action organizing (Organizing for Social Change, Ch 2): 1. Win real, immediate, concrete improvements in peoples’ lives 2. Give people a sense of their own power 3. Alter the relations of power (in this case, showing a city council you have the ability to mobilize people and that they will be held accountable, which equals political collective-power).
    5. Is interdisciplinary. Model resolutions provide an opportunity for diverse issues to work together. For example, the Fortify!/No Hate model resolution not only asks councils to support the No Hate in WA State campaign to oppose a pair of initiatives, it acknowledges that money in politics, a flawed initiative process, and voters casually signing initiative petitions all contribute to the problem. It’s an opportunity to acknowledge and educate on root causes and issue relationships, not just narrow manifestations of these problems.
    6. Connects the local to the State or Federal (ex., asks Council to endorse or oppose legislation). This is an easy way to make a resolution more than performative, because they will want to think about what they’re doing and learn about the legislation before taking what is a substantive and concrete, even if limited, stand.
    7. Connects the big-picture issue to the City itself. Some Councils use the excuse of a resolution lacking a ‘local connection’ to get out of having to consider important issues, despite the fact that big-picture issues affect people, and people live in their cities. By explicitly stating the connection, they can’t deny it. For example, “The council should endorse Medicare4All because medical debt affects people in our city, too, and can result in homelessness, which our city experiences.”
    8. Asks the Council to take substantive action. If the issue is generally not within their power to take action, then ask them to endorse legislation. Whatever the action is, it must be strong enough to force councilmembers to take an actual stand, not just get away with performative statements. The former is inspiring to residents, organizers, and activists. The latter is deflating.
    9. Will inspire residents to mobilize to City Council meetings. A major goal of all this is to get folks engaged with their city councils. Every first-time attendee is a win. Every one of them who thinks, “Maybe I should run for office” is an achievement. People resonate with big-picture issues more than they do the nuts-and-bolts of city function (despite how important the latter is in actuality).
    10. It explains, educates, and markets the issue/campaign. Model resolutions aren’t model legislation, they are ways to get the word out and educate both residents and elected officials. They are marketing and organizing tools. For example, residents aren’t the only folks who may not understand something like Ranked Choice Voting. Most elected officials themselves don’t really understand the very systems (and their failures) that got them elected.
    11. Think like an organizer, not like city staff. Our job is to make the ask. It’s not our job to put it in the city’s format and “legalese”, and we don’t need to be attorneys or policy wonks to write effective model resolutions. And we certainly shouldn’t self-limit ourselves on behalf of the City. Organizers and staff have different priorities. If you judge the value of the resolution based on its policy characteristics, you may be disappointed, but if you judge it on its organizing potential and outcomes, it’s a win, regardless of what happens. You may have to push back on councilmembers who are thinking like city staff and want to get rid of parts they don’t think have strength or value, such as the endorsement of state legislation. This is also why we post both versions – what we asked for (model resolution) and what we got – so folks can compare later.
    12. Neither a slam-dunk nor something councils can dismiss outright. If it’s too easy and performative, it’ll get unanimous support and give the elected officials a free pass. If it’s too out there it will be dismissed outright. The ideal is something that will garner mixed (but hopefully passing) votes, exposing the values of our elected officials and letting us know who may need to be challenged in the next election.
    13. How does this resolution set the stage for future action? A somewhat generic, values-based resolution may not have much in terms of teeth, but it can be leveraged for future resolutions that do have teeth. For example, Shoreline Res542 (2025) set the stage to ask the Council to pass the resolution to Fortify! WA Against Anti-Trans Initiatives and Wealthy Exremists(2026). Efforts that build on each other are also, of course, more opportunities to keep and get more folks engaged with their city councils.
    14. Community- and power-building are the ultimate goals, regardless of the resolution’s outcome. Sometimes even “losing” is the greater victory, as it will energize the base with indignation, and set the effort up for a future win.

    Now, are city councils going to pass the model resolutions verbatim? Likely not. And that’s okay. This is, again, why every posting on the Fortify! website about a local effort includes the model resolution (“What we asked for”) and the passed resolution (“What we got”), so folks can judge for themselves the action of the council, and know who voted for and against it – useful info for future elections.

    Resolutions can be performative or the wrong tool for the job, but by thinking like an organizer, model resolutions can be an effective way for an issue-expert organization’s work to be amplified in a space that has been too-long ignored (and ignored at our long-term peril).

  • No Hate in WA State and Fortify! WA ask Shoreline City Council to Agendize and Pass Resolution Opposing Heywood Anti-Transgender Initiatives

    June 1, 2026 (Shoreline, WA) – Roberto Lopez, speaking on behalf of the No Hate in WA State campaign after receiving the City of Shoreline’s Pride Proclamation from Deputy Mayor Eben Pobee, asked the Shoreline City Council to Pass the Resolution to Fortify! WA Against Anti-Trans Initiatives and Wealthy Extremists.

    While it appears there are two Council members ready to sponsor the resolution, setting the stage for Shoreline to be the first city to pass such a resolution, we need to be ready to show the Council that the community supports them taking this stand when it comes up for a vote.

    This is where you come in: Please sign and share the online Nextcloud petition!

    If you would like to print out petitions and collect hard-copy signatures, you can find the resolution/petition PDF here. If you choose to collect hard copy signatures, please see the instructions at the bottom of the petition pages.

    If you would like to get on No Hate in WA State’s mailing list, please go here.

    For any questions about the petition process, please write info(at)fortifywa(dot)org.

  • Featured Summer ’26: Fortify! WA against Anti-Trans Initiatives and Wealthy Extremists

    This model resolution meets the moment by directly opposing the latest California mega-millionaire Brian Heywood-funded initiatives, this time a truly bigoted attack on trans folks in Washington state with some terrible, harmful policy proposals, like how “IL26-638 could force invasive genital exams on girls of any age to play sports at any level.” This creepy proposal could result in genital exams that would affect ALL girls who wish to play sports (trans or no, and all boys are exempt, including trans boys). See the misogynistic, cringey details in the model resolution itself.

    This model resolution amplifies the work of No Hate WA State. To sign up for news and updates directly from No Hate WA State, go here: https://nohateinwastate.org/join-the-mailing-list

    Start by signing and sharing this Nextcloud Online Petition Form: https://share.mayfirst.org/apps/forms/s/Pa2KmkEknQf4jHJSDFRZiZca

    Printable Resolution and Petition pages (PDF file): Fortify! WA against anti-trans legislation and wealthy extremists

    Letter-Sized Solidarity Sign (PDF) with QR code to hand out at city council meetings or other actions: https://share.mayfirst.org/s/R5DgzsnFDrtE8Az

    Articles:
    Marie Claire, July 13, 2026: Anti-Trans Legislation Isn’t About “Protecting Girls”—It’s About Distracting Us From What Matters (Soccer Star Megan Rapinoe on how Heywood’s initiatives are an attack on women as a whole.)
    KUOW, June 4, 2026: Transgender ballot initiative could require genital exams for WA secondary school students

  • News (2/23/26): Recipe for Swift Victory in Shoreline WA

    Fortify! and Shoreline Solidarity Get Res 560 Protecting Immigrants Agendized and Passed in Two Weeks

    Feb 23, 2026 (Shoreline, WA): The last three weeks saw an ideal Fortify! WA mini-campaign with the fast-growing Shoreline Solidarity group: We show up en masse to make an ask at the Feb 9th, ’26 City Council public comment, setting a deadline of two weeks. We follow-up. Our ask was agendized just over a week later. At the next, Feb 23rd, meeting we show up en mass to support the agenda item. It passes.

    It was, of course, changed by city staff to work for the city, so it’s not exactly what we asked for, but we knew it wouldn’t be and it left out very little of what we requested. This is why we always include what we asked for vs what we got in our reporting out of results (see below).

    At the end of the day, however, it is a solid win, even including some improvements in language.

    This was the Fortify! process in ideal form (based on the Midwest Academy model of direct action organizing). It also illustrated the power of translating mutual-aid community-building into political power. The whole process from ask to passage was an astonishingly swift two weeks.

    It doesn’t get much better than that.

    And the even bigger victory? Many of the folks who came out to City Council did so for the first time, and almost immediately there was talk of folks considering running for city council in the future.

    This is how we get folks engaged at the beginning of the political pipeline to work for long-term systems change.

    More info here:

    News Release: Shoreline Unanimously Passes Immigrant Protection Resolution

    What we asked for: Fortify! Washington for Immigrant Protection
    What we got: Res 560 – Support and Protect Immigrant Members

    City of Shoreline Website: Immigrants, Refugees, and Res560

    Coverage by The Osprey, highlighting the critical importance of hyper-local media: